[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17836113#comment-17836113
]
Piotr Nowojski commented on FLINK-34704:
----------------------------------------
Sounds good to me (y) Indeed we could later provide some kind of overdraft
buffer capacity to be used just for checkpointing. I think that this might
relate to the things I want to propose in FLIP-443 as it will give the AWOP
some way of knowing that it should use the overdraft buffer. Let's discuss this
later and keep the ticket open :)
> Process checkpoint barrier in AsyncWaitOperator when the element queue is full
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-34704
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34704
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Task
> Reporter: Zakelly Lan
> Priority: Minor
>
> As discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/4f7ywn29kdv4302j2rq3fkxc6pc8myr2 . Maybe it
> is better to provide such a new `yield` that can process mail with low
> priority in the mailbox executor. More discussion needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
