fredia commented on code in PR #24748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24748#discussion_r1596619045


##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/asyncprocessing/EpochManager.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.asyncprocessing;
+
+import javax.annotation.Nullable;
+
+import java.util.LinkedList;
+
+/**
+ * Epoch manager segments inputs into distinct epochs, marked by the arrival 
of non-records(e.g.
+ * watermark, record attributes). Records are assigned to a unique epoch based 
on their arrival,
+ * records within an epoch are allowed to be parallelized, while the 
non-record of an epoch can only
+ * be executed when all records in this epoch have finished.
+ *
+ * <p>For more details please refer to FLIP-425.
+ */
+public class EpochManager {
+
+    /**
+     * This enum defines whether parallel execution between epochs is allowed. 
We should keep this
+     * internal and away from API module for now, until we could see the 
concrete need for {@link
+     * #PARALLEL_BETWEEN_EPOCH} from average users.
+     */
+    public enum ParallelMode {
+        /**
+         * Subsequent epochs must wait until the previous epoch is completed 
before they can start.
+         */
+        SERIAL_BETWEEN_EPOCH,
+        /**
+         * Subsequent epochs can begin execution even if the previous epoch 
has not yet completed.
+         * Usually performs better than {@link #SERIAL_BETWEEN_EPOCH}.
+         */
+        PARALLEL_BETWEEN_EPOCH
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The reference to the {@link AsyncExecutionController}, used for {@link
+     * ParallelMode#SERIAL_BETWEEN_EPOCH}. Can be null when testing.
+     */
+    final AsyncExecutionController asyncExecutionController;
+
+    /** The number of epochs that have arrived. */
+    long epochNum;
+
+    /** The output queue to hold ongoing epochs. */
+    LinkedList<Epoch> outputQueue;
+
+    /** Current active epoch, only one active epoch at the same time. */
+    Epoch activeEpoch;
+
+    public EpochManager(AsyncExecutionController aec) {
+        this.epochNum = 0;
+        this.outputQueue = new LinkedList<>();
+        // preset an empty epoch, the epoch action will be updated when 
non-record is received.
+        this.activeEpoch = new Epoch(epochNum++);
+        this.outputQueue.add(activeEpoch);
+        this.asyncExecutionController = aec;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Add a record to the current epoch and return the current open epoch, 
the epoch will be
+     * associated with the {@link RecordContext} of this record. Must be 
invoked within task thread.
+     *
+     * @return the current open epoch.
+     */
+    public Epoch onRecord() {
+        activeEpoch.ongoingRecordCount++;
+        return activeEpoch;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Add a non-record to the current epoch, close current epoch and open a 
new epoch. Must be
+     * invoked within task thread.
+     *
+     * @param action the action associated with this non-record.
+     * @param parallelMode the parallel mode for this epoch.
+     */
+    public void onNonRecord(Runnable action, ParallelMode parallelMode) {

Review Comment:
   Because there is no exception in the signature of `disposeContext()` , if we 
change Runnable to ThrowingRunnable here, we need to catch the exception in 
`aec.disposeContext()` or  `epochManager.completeOneRecord()`.
   
   I think that catching exceptions in `StreamOperator` is more convenient



##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/asyncprocessing/AsyncExecutionController.java:
##########
@@ -311,6 +318,10 @@ public void drainInflightRecords(int targetNum) {
         }
     }
 
+    public EpochManager getEpochManager() {
+        return epochManager;

Review Comment:
   👍Thanks for the suggestion, I added `processNonRecord()` for aec, 
`EpochManager` is not visible for operators now. 



##########
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/asyncprocessing/EpochManagerTest.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.asyncprocessing;
+
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.asyncprocessing.EpochManager.Epoch;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.asyncprocessing.EpochManager.EpochStatus;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.asyncprocessing.EpochManager.ParallelMode;
+
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
+
+import static org.assertj.core.api.AssertionsForClassTypes.assertThat;
+
+/** Test for Epoch Manager. */
+class EpochManagerTest {
+    @Test
+    void testBasic() {
+        EpochManager epochManager = new EpochManager(null);
+        Epoch epoch1 = epochManager.onRecord();
+        Epoch epoch2 = epochManager.onRecord();
+        assertThat(epoch1).isEqualTo(epoch2);
+        assertThat(epoch1.ongoingRecordCount).isEqualTo(2);
+        AtomicInteger output = new AtomicInteger(0);
+        epochManager.onNonRecord(
+                () -> {
+                    output.incrementAndGet();
+                },
+                ParallelMode.PARALLEL_BETWEEN_EPOCH);

Review Comment:
   Constructing aec is troublesome and will bring a lot of duplicate code, so I 
put the test of `SERIAL_BETWEEN_EPOCH ` in `AsyncExecutionControllerTest `. I 
added a test for mix epoch mode in `AsyncExecutionControllerTest `.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to