XComp opened a new pull request, #24954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24954

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   The package-private constructor slipped through when deprecating the `Time` 
classes in FLINK-32570 causing the the `ClassCastException` when deserializing 
the 1.18 `JobGraph` with 1.19 as described in FLINK-35639:
   ```
   java.lang.ClassCastException: cannot assign instance of 
org.apache.flink.api.common.time.Time to field 
org.apache.flink.api.common.restartstrategy.RestartStrategies$FixedDelayRestartStrategyConfiguration.delayBetweenAttemptsInterval
 of type java.time.Duration in instance of 
org.apache.flink.api.common.restartstrategy.RestartStrategies$FixedDelayRestartStrategyConfiguration
   at 
java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.encodeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:315)
 ~[?:?]
   at 
java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.completeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:320)
 ~[?:?]
   at 
java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1770)
 ~[?:?]
   at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) 
~[?:?]
   at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) 
~[?:?]
   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840) ~[?:?] Caused by: 
java.lang.ClassCastException: cannot assign instance of 
org.apache.flink.api.common.time.Time to field 
org.apache.flink.api.common.restartstrategy.RestartStrategies$FixedDelayRestartStrategyConfiguration.delayBetweenAttemptsInterval
 of type java.time.Duration in instance of 
org.apache.flink.api.common.restartstrategy.RestartStrategies$FixedDelayRestartStrategyConfiguration
   at 
java.io.ObjectStreamClass$FieldReflector.setObjFieldValues(ObjectStreamClass.java:2096)
 ~[?:?]
   at 
java.io.ObjectStreamClass$FieldReflector.checkObjectFieldValueTypes(ObjectStreamClass.java:2060)
 ~[?:?]
   at 
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.checkObjFieldValueTypes(ObjectStreamClass.java:1347) 
~[?:?]
   at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream$FieldValues.defaultCheckFieldValues(ObjectInputStream.java:2679)
 ~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:2486) 
~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:2257) 
~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1733) ~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream$FieldValues.<init>(ObjectInputStream.java:2606) 
~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:2457) 
~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:2257) 
~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1733) ~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:509) ~[?:?]
   at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:467) ~[?:?]
   ```
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   * Added package-private constructor back and marked it as deprecated
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   I verified once more that we don't have any other similar error in the 
FLINK-32570 related commits: 
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/99d6fd3c68f46daf0397a35566414e1d19774c3d 
and https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/c943ab49
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: yes
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: yes
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to