[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15711605#comment-15711605
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4523:
---------------------------------------

Github user tony810430 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2916#discussion_r90420861
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-streaming-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/config/ConsumerConfigConstants.java
 ---
    @@ -53,6 +56,9 @@ public SentinelSequenceNumber toSentinelSequenceNumber() {
        /** The initial position to start reading Kinesis streams from (LATEST 
is used if not set) */
        public static final String STREAM_INITIAL_POSITION = 
"flink.stream.initpos";
     
    +   /** The initial timestamp to start reading Kinesis stream from (when 
AT_TIMESTAMP is set for STREAM_INITIAL_POSITION */
    +   public static final String STREAM_INITIAL_TIMESTAMP = 
"flink.stream.init.timestamp";
    --- End diff --
    
    ok


> Allow Kinesis Consumer to start from specific timestamp / Date
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4523
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4523
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Kinesis Connector
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Assignee: Wei-Che Wei
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> We had a Kinesis user requesting this feature on an offline chat.
> To be specific, we let all initial Kinesis shards be iterated starting from 
> records at the given timestamp.
> The AWS Java SDK we're using already provides API for this, so we can add 
> this functionality with fairly low overhead: 
> http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaSDK/latest/javadoc/com/amazonaws/services/kinesis/model/GetShardIteratorRequest.html#setTimestamp-java.util.Date-



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to