RocMarshal commented on PR #123: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/123#issuecomment-2244122538
> Note: Before the merge, we can consider removing the backward-compatibility module (and workflow) to avoid generating the jar, as it was only meant to be a helper. Hi, @eskabetxe Considering that this is a relatively large refactoring action, Perhaps retaining this module can also help developers quickly verify and fix compatibility related issues. How about continuing to keep one or two versions of the cycle? In other words, keep this module until the refactored code becomes stable and mature. Please let me know what's your opinion. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
