[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15723246#comment-15723246
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3921:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2901#discussion_r90944828
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/io/DelimitedInputFormat.java
---
@@ -182,8 +186,37 @@ protected DelimitedInputFormat(Path filePath,
Configuration configuration) {
}
loadConfigParameters(configuration);
}
-
-
+
+ /**
+ * Get the character set used for the row delimiter, field delimiter,
+ * comment string, and {@link FieldParser}.
+ *
+ * @return the charset
+ */
+ @PublicEvolving
+ public Charset getCharset() {
+ if (this.charset == null) {
+ this.charset = Charset.forName(charsetName);
+ }
+ return this.charset;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Set the name of the character set used for the row delimiter, field
+ * delimiter, comment string, and {@link FieldParser}.
+ *
+ * The delimeters and comment string are interpreted when set. Each
--- End diff --
Btw., the `DelimitedInputFormat` does not have a comment string or field
parsers.
> StringParser not specifying encoding to use
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3921
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3921
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0.3
> Reporter: Tatu Saloranta
> Assignee: Rekha Joshi
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Class `flink.types.parser.StringParser` has javadocs indicating that contents
> are expected to be Ascii, similar to `StringValueParser`. That makes sense,
> but when constructing actual instance, no encoding is specified; on line 66
> f.ex:
> this.result = new String(bytes, startPos+1, i - startPos - 2);
> which leads to using whatever default platform encoding is. If contents
> really are always Ascii (would not count on that as parser is used from CSV
> reader), not a big deal, but it can lead to the usual Latin-1-VS-UTF-8 issues.
> So I think that encoding should be explicitly specified, whatever is to be
> used: javadocs claim ascii, so could be "us-ascii", but could well be UTF-8
> or even ISO-8859-1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
