Github user StefanRRichter commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992#discussion_r92199074
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/core/fs/CloseableRegistryImpl.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.flink.core.fs;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.util.AbstractCloseableRegistry;
    +
    +import java.io.Closeable;
    +import java.io.IOException;
    +import java.util.HashMap;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +
    +/**
    + * This class allows to register instances of {@link Closeable}, which are 
all closed if this registry is closed.
    + * <p>
    + * Registering to an already closed registry will throw an exception and 
close the provided {@link Closeable}
    + * <p>
    + * All methods in this class are thread-safe.
    + */
    +public class CloseableRegistryImpl extends 
AbstractCloseableRegistry<Closeable, Object> implements CloseableRegistry {
    --- End diff --
    
    I also totally agree that it should implement ``CloseableRegistry ``. 
However, this it can not trivially implement the interface without making 
``CloseableRegistry `` generic in ``<C extends Closeable>``.  This in turn 
would lead to some nasty naming like ``CloseableRegistry<Closeable>``. Maybe it 
is just a naming problem after all, just yet lacking the right idea on those 
names :-)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to