morhidi commented on PR #945:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/945#issuecomment-2669434319

   > Why would we close it? I think the PR makes sense , but it would be good 
to be able to configure the behavior as Max suggested
   
   
   > Perhaps we can add an option to allow collecting metrics in the 
stabilization phase?
   
   > Why would we close it? I think the PR makes sense , but it would be good 
to be able to configure the behavior as Max suggested
   
   > I'm not 100% sure this change will yield the desired outcome. There are 
some issues with collecting metrics in the stabilization phase, which is why we 
explicitly chose to not collect any that phase:
   > 
   > Metrics are not available yet which will be evident in exceptions from the 
Rest API
   > Metrics may be incomplete
   > Metrics values will be skewed in the stabilization phase.
   > After this change, there is no way to externally asses the source-of-truth 
metrics which will be used for evaluation. This makes debugging the autoscaling 
algorithm harder.
   > 
   > Perhaps we can add an option to allow collecting metrics in the 
stabilization phase?
   
   I guess Max is under the assumption that the current logic does not collect 
metrics during the stabilization period. This PR does not change that logic, so 
not sure what should be controlled by a flag. The only thing the PR does is 
that it reports those metrics. Can you clarify?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to