[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Anton Solovev updated FLINK-5338:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
This is a suggestion, up for discussion.

I suggest to make the {{DataStream::print()}} sink function inherently 
non-parallel, i.e., always executed in a single parallel sink.

Since printing is only for toy setups anyways, and the performance is usually 
bound by the stdout stream, non-parallel prints should be sufficient.

  was:
This is a suggestion, up for discussion.

I suggest to make the {{DataStream::pring()}} sink function inherently 
non-parallel, i.e., always executed in a single parallel sink.

Since printing is only for toy setups anyways, and the performance is usually 
bound by the stdout stream, non-parallel prints should be sufficient.


> Make printing sinks non-parallel
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5338
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5338
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Streaming
>            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> This is a suggestion, up for discussion.
> I suggest to make the {{DataStream::print()}} sink function inherently 
> non-parallel, i.e., always executed in a single parallel sink.
> Since printing is only for toy setups anyways, and the performance is usually 
> bound by the stdout stream, non-parallel prints should be sufficient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to