[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anton Solovev updated FLINK-5338:
---------------------------------
Description:
This is a suggestion, up for discussion.
I suggest to make the {{DataStream::print()}} sink function inherently
non-parallel, i.e., always executed in a single parallel sink.
Since printing is only for toy setups anyways, and the performance is usually
bound by the stdout stream, non-parallel prints should be sufficient.
was:
This is a suggestion, up for discussion.
I suggest to make the {{DataStream::pring()}} sink function inherently
non-parallel, i.e., always executed in a single parallel sink.
Since printing is only for toy setups anyways, and the performance is usually
bound by the stdout stream, non-parallel prints should be sufficient.
> Make printing sinks non-parallel
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5338
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: Stephan Ewen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> This is a suggestion, up for discussion.
> I suggest to make the {{DataStream::print()}} sink function inherently
> non-parallel, i.e., always executed in a single parallel sink.
> Since printing is only for toy setups anyways, and the performance is usually
> bound by the stdout stream, non-parallel prints should be sufficient.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)