AlanConfluent commented on code in PR #26567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26567#discussion_r2164915702


##########
flink-table/flink-table-api-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/table/api/config/ExecutionConfigOptions.java:
##########
@@ -456,6 +456,49 @@ public class ExecutionConfigOptions {
                             "The max number of async retry attempts to make 
before task "
                                     + "execution is failed.");
 
+    // ------------------------------------------------------------------------
+    //  Async Table Function
+    // ------------------------------------------------------------------------
+    @Documentation.TableOption(execMode = Documentation.ExecMode.STREAMING)
+    public static final ConfigOption<Integer> 
TABLE_EXEC_ASYNC_TABLE_MAX_CONCURRENT_OPERATIONS =
+            key("table.exec.async-table.max-concurrent-operations")

Review Comment:
   > Reply to the vote thread of the AsyncScalarFunction FLIP to let people 
know that we want to use the new config name, which is more intuitive. And for 
backwards compatibility, we are going to make the old key as deprecated key.
   If there is no objection, we can update the AsyncScalarFunction FLIP to add 
the description of this change.
   
   Ok, that all sounds good.  I'll do that.
   
   > Given that these are addition of new things to multiple components. It 
might make sense to have a new separate FLIP, which aims to align all the SQL 
physical behavior to support hints.
   
   I agree, that seems good to have a single FLIP if the aim is to make them 
all consistent.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to