twalthr commented on PR #26879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26879#issuecomment-3168412455

   @xuyangzhong what do you think about this change? Is acceptable to simply 
update the affected test or do we need changes in `DuplicateChangesInferRule`? 
The current Flink behavior is incorrect: if a sink requests retract, the engine 
needs to guarantee that -U will be send, independent of the primary key 
declaration.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to