snuyanzin commented on code in PR #27290:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27290#discussion_r2574360069


##########
flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/test/resources/org/apache/flink/table/planner/plan/rules/logical/JoinDependentConditionDerivationRuleTest.xml:
##########
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ LogicalProject(a=[$0], d=[$3])
     <Resource name="optimized rel plan">
       <![CDATA[
 LogicalProject(a=[$0], d=[$3])
-+- LogicalJoin(condition=[AND(OR(AND(=($0, 1), =($1, 1), =($3, 2), =($4, 2)), 
AND(=($0, 2), =($1, 2), =($3, 1), =($4, 1))), OR(AND(=(1, $0), =(1, $1)), 
AND(=(2, $0), =(2, $1))), OR(AND(=(2, $3), =(2, $4)), AND(=(1, $3), =(1, 
$4))))], joinType=[inner])
++- LogicalJoin(condition=[AND(OR(AND(=($0, 1), =($1, 1), =($3, 2), =($4, 2)), 
AND(=($0, 2), =($1, 2), =($3, 1), =($4, 1))), OR(AND(=($0, 1), =($1, 1)), 
AND(=($0, 2), =($1, 2))), OR(AND(=($3, 2), =($4, 2)), AND(=($3, 1), =($4, 
1))))], joinType=[inner])

Review Comment:
   Here and all other changes in `*.xml`: the only difference is the order of 
operands like 
   before the change `=(1, $0)`  and after `=($0, 1)` which in fact makes no 
difference. Same for others



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to