MartijnVisser commented on code in PR #153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/153#discussion_r2639141346
##########
flink-shaded-asm-9/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ under the License.
<properties>
<asm.major.version>9</asm.major.version>
- <asm.version>${asm.major.version}.8</asm.version>
+ <asm.version>${asm.major.version}.9</asm.version>
Review Comment:
@mateczagany Do you think we should upgrade to 9.9.1?
##########
flink-shaded-swagger/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE:
##########
@@ -6,16 +6,16 @@ The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
This project bundles the following dependencies under the Apache Software
License 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt)
-- com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml:2.18.2
-- com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310:2.18.2
-- io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-annotations:2.2.19
-- io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-core:2.2.19
-- io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-models:2.2.19
+- com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml:2.20.1
+- com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310:2.20.1
+- io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-annotations:2.2.40
+- io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-core:2.2.40
+- io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-models:2.2.40
Review Comment:
Do you think we should upgrade to 2.2.41 here?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
