GitHub user JinkunLiu added a comment to the discussion: [Feature] Enhance the quickstart experience
Hello @xintongsong Thanks for your advice. About you question: > Not entirely sure what you mean by "Flink's Quick Start". Flink's [First > Steps](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/getting-started/local_installation/) > provides three options, none of which uses the MiniCluster. I think the [Flink-Agents docs Quickstart](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-agents-docs-main/docs/get-started/quickstart/workflow_agent/) is analogous to [Flink's Tutorial section](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/getting-started/table_api/). Perhaps my earlier wording was a bit unclear — I only want to use mini cluster in the [Flink-Agents docs Quickstart](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-agents-docs-main/docs/get-started/quickstart/workflow_agent/) instead of a standalone cluster. I think move `Submit Flink Agents Job to Standalone Flink Cluster` to another location maybe is better? But If you're concerned about submitting the Quickstart demo to the miniCluster, it's better to keep that. > Alternatively, we can wait until the project becomes more stable. I've never > worked on an archetype, thus not sure how much effort that takes. WDYT? I agree that we can do it later. In terms of development cost, I don't think the overall difficulty is high; however, iterating before things are stable might be a bit troublesome. > about structure you offered Yes, that structure looks better, but I wan to know whether you have more details about what the `Wizard part` should do? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/flink-agents/discussions/555#discussioncomment-15987236 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
