[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Radley reassigned FLINK-39235:
------------------------------------

    Assignee: David Radley

> add 
> ----
>
>                 Key: FLINK-39235
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39235
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Technical Debt
>          Components: Connectors / HTTP
>            Reporter: David Radley
>            Assignee: David Radley
>            Priority: Major
>
> We have a propietary json format in IBM that we use that allows literals to 
> be specified. 
> We are looking to move off this code an use the open source connector. 
>  
> Initially I was thinking that we could have a subsequent view that introduced 
> a constant. This works in most cases. It does not work when there is second a 
> downstream lookup join when the constant is a boolean object or array. The 
> reason for this i that a lookup join needs an equality from the table planner 
> for the lookup join and these types correctly do not result in that.  
> I propose we have a 'http.response.additional-json' similar to 
> 'http.request.additional-body-json' but for responses. This would hide the 
> constants from the table planner. With these considerations
> -  We would allow only fields that were defined in the table to be specified. 
>  
> - what do we do if the response actually returns this field. I suggest a 
> second field 'response.honour.additional-json' when true means the config 
> wins. 
> - We should type check the supplied json in this config. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to