infocusmodereal opened a new pull request, #27814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27814

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This pull request avoids materializing file-merging operator state handles 
when operator list state is registered but empty.
   
   Today `DefaultOperatorStateBackendSnapshotStrategy` only takes the empty 
fast path when there are no registered operator states at all. If empty 
operator list states are registered, file-merging checkpoints can still create 
tiny segment-backed handles. During restore, `OperatorStateRestoreOperation` 
opens those handles even though they contain no operator-state partitions. On 
object stores this adds avoidable restore overhead.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - Detect the case where there are no broadcast states and all registered 
operator list states are empty
   - Reuse the existing empty snapshot fast path for that case
   - Return `EmptyFileMergingOperatorStreamStateHandle` for file-merging 
checkpoints and `SnapshotResult.empty()` otherwise
   - Add tests for empty registered operator state snapshots and file-merging 
restore
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follow [the 
conventions for tests defined in our code quality 
guide](https://flink.apache.org/how-to-contribute/code-style-and-quality-common/#7-testing).
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   - Added `testSnapshotWithEmptyRegisteredOperatorState`
   - Added `testFileMergingSnapshotRestoreWithEmptyRegisteredUnionState`
   - Ran `JAVA_HOME=$(/usr/libexec/java_home -v 17) ./mvnw -pl flink-runtime 
-Dtest=OperatorStateBackendTest,OperatorStateRestoreOperationTest,SharedStateRegistryTest
 test -Djdk17 -Pjava17-target`
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
   - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
   - The serializers: no
   - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
   - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: yes
   - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
   - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
   - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to