weiqingy opened a new pull request, #28718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/28718

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This pull request adds a public getter on `RowDataSerializerSnapshot` that 
returns the top-level `RowData` field names persisted by FLINK-40120, so 
external consumers can read them. It returns `null` for legacy snapshots 
(version 3 and earlier) written before field-name persistence.
   
   Note: this PR **stacks on #28717 (FLINK-40120)**, which is under review. 
Until #28717 merges, the diff here also contains its changes; the net-new 
change in this PR is the single public getter (see the latest commit). It will 
be rebased onto a clean master once #28717 merges.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - Add `public @Nullable String[] getFieldNames()` on 
`RowDataSerializerSnapshot`, returning the persisted top-level field names 
(`null` for legacy version-3-and-earlier snapshots).
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   - `snapshotPublicGetterReturnsPersistedNames` — a snapshot taken from a 
named serializer returns the top-level names through the public getter.
   - A restored version-3-layout snapshot's `getFieldNames()` returns `null`.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
   - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no — the getter is on `RowDataSerializerSnapshot`, whose 
enclosing `RowDataSerializer` is `@Internal`
   - The serializers: yes — adds a read-only accessor on 
`RowDataSerializerSnapshot`; no change to the serialization format or behavior
   - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
   - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager, Checkpointing, 
Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no — read-only accessor, no format or 
restore-behavior change
   - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
   - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
   - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable (the getter carries 
JavaDoc)
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   - [X] Yes (Claude Code, Claude Opus 4.8)
   
   Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.8)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to