[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15840738#comment-15840738
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2821:
---------------------------------------

Github user peay commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2917
  
    This did not work for me with `1.2.0-rc2`. Is there something special to do 
to make it bind on `0.0.0.0` now?
    
    I am still getting:
    
    ```
    dropping message [class akka.actor.ActorSelectionMessage] for non-local 
recipient [Actor[akka.tcp://[email protected]:6123/]] arriving at 
[akka.tcp://[email protected]:6123] inbound addresses are 
[akka.tcp://[email protected]:6123]
    ```
    
    with `JOB_MANAGER_RPC_ADDRESS=jobmanager.flink.svc.cluster.local`.


> Change Akka configuration to allow accessing actors from different URLs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2821
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Distributed Coordination
>            Reporter: Robert Metzger
>            Assignee: Maximilian Michels
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> Akka expects the actor's URL to be exactly matching.
> As pointed out here, cases where users were complaining about this: 
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Error-trying-to-access-JM-through-proxy-td3018.html
>   - Proxy routing (as described here, send to the proxy URL, receiver 
> recognizes only original URL)
>   - Using hostname / IP interchangeably does not work (we solved this by 
> always putting IP addresses into URLs, never hostnames)
>   - Binding to multiple interfaces (any local 0.0.0.0) does not work. Still 
> no solution to that (but seems not too much of a restriction)
> I am aware that this is not possible due to Akka, so it is actually not a 
> Flink bug. But I think we should track the resolution of the issue here 
> anyways because its affecting our user's satisfaction.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to