Savonitar opened a new pull request, #29209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/29209

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   RocksDB MapState and timer iterators currently check their key prefix in 
Java after a native seek returns. When state contains many tombstones, RocksDB 
can scan through unrelated key ranges while searching for the next live entry. 
This increases CPU usage during state access and can significantly delay timer 
queue initialization after restore, which performs a seek for every assigned 
key group.
   This change sets a native exclusive upper bound for each iterator, limiting 
it to the map’s key-group/key/namespace prefix or the timer queue’s key-group 
prefix. It prevents scanning unrelated tombstones while preserving the intended 
results. The change also guards exhausted MapState resume seeks before 
advancing and clears inherited seek restrictions on the private options copy so 
they cannot omit valid entries.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - Check iterator validity before advancing after a MapState cache-refill 
seek.
   - Bound MapState iteration, isEmpty(), and clear() to the current 
key-group/key/namespace prefix, and timer iteration to its key-group prefix.
   - Give each bounded iterator its own ReadOptions and upper-bound Slice, 
closing them together with the native iterator.
   - Enable auto-prefix mode and clear inherited prefix and lower-bound 
restrictions on the private options copy.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   - Added RocksDBMapStateTest coverage for exhausted resume seeks and 
operations next to tombstone-heavy neighboring maps.
   - Extended KeyGroupPartitionedPriorityQueueWithRocksDBStoreTest to verify 
bounded seeks during timer queue initialization and cache refill.
   - Added RocksDBPrefixIteratorTest coverage for prefix-end calculation, 
native iteration boundaries, prefix extractors, inherited read options, 
snapshots, and resource cleanup.
   - Confirmed that the relevant regression tests fail when the bounds, 
validity guard, or read-option protections are removed.
   - Verified locally with JDK 17: all 51 focused cases passed, and the full 
RocksDB module unit suite completed with 881 executed cases passing. Spotless 
and Checkstyle passed.
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
     - The serializers: (no)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes RocksDB 
MapState access and timer queue operations)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes, timer queue 
initialization during state restoration, e.g. after recovery)
     - The S3 file system connector: (no)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (JavaDocs)
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change the checkbox below to `[X]` and replace the placeholder in the 
"Generated-by"
   line with the tool name and version. Otherwise remove the "Generated-by" 
line.
   See the ASF Generative Tooling Guidance for details:
   https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html
   
   You are responsible for the quality and correctness of every change in this 
PR
   regardless of the tooling used. Low-effort AI-generated PRs will be closed. 
See
   AGENTS.md for the full guidance.
   -->
   
   - [+ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   Generated-by: Claude Fable 5.1
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to