[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849618#comment-15849618
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4574:
---------------------------------------

Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2925#discussion_r99066645
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/internals/ShardConsumer.java
 ---
    @@ -154,42 +166,115 @@ public void run() {
                                                }
                                        }
     
    -                                   // set the nextShardItr so we can 
continue iterating in the next while loop
    -                                   nextShardItr = 
getRecordsResult.getNextShardIterator();
    +                                   // set the startShardItr so we can 
continue iterating in the next while loop
    +                                   startShardItr = 
getRecordsResult.getNextShardIterator();
                                } else {
                                        // the last record was non-aggregated, 
so we can simply start from the next record
    -                                   nextShardItr = 
kinesis.getShardIterator(subscribedShard, 
ShardIteratorType.AFTER_SEQUENCE_NUMBER.toString(), 
lastSequenceNum.getSequenceNumber());
    +                                   startShardItr = 
kinesis.getShardIterator(subscribedShard, 
ShardIteratorType.AFTER_SEQUENCE_NUMBER.toString(), 
lastSequenceNum.getSequenceNumber());
                                }
                        }
     
    -                   while(isRunning()) {
    -                           if (nextShardItr == null) {
    -                                   
fetcherRef.updateState(subscribedShardStateIndex, 
SentinelSequenceNumber.SENTINEL_SHARD_ENDING_SEQUENCE_NUM.get());
    -
    -                                   // we can close this consumer thread 
once we've reached the end of the subscribed shard
    -                                   break;
    -                           } else {
    -                                   if (fetchIntervalMillis != 0) {
    -                                           
Thread.sleep(fetchIntervalMillis);
    -                                   }
    +                   ArrayBlockingQueue<UserRecord> queue = new 
ArrayBlockingQueue<>(maxNumberOfRecordsPerFetch);
    +                   ShardConsumerFetcher shardConsumerFetcher;
     
    -                                   GetRecordsResult getRecordsResult = 
getRecords(nextShardItr, maxNumberOfRecordsPerFetch);
    +                   if (fetchIntervalMillis > 0L) {
    +                           shardConsumerFetcher = new 
ShardConsumerFetcher(this, startShardItr, queue, false);
    +                           timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(shardConsumerFetcher, 
0L, fetchIntervalMillis);
    +                   } else {
    +                           // if fetchIntervalMillis is 0, make the task 
run forever and schedule it once only.
    +                           shardConsumerFetcher = new 
ShardConsumerFetcher(this, startShardItr, queue, true);
    +                           timer.schedule(shardConsumerFetcher, 0L);
    +                   }
     
    -                                   // each of the Kinesis records may be 
aggregated, so we must deaggregate them before proceeding
    -                                   List<UserRecord> fetchedRecords = 
deaggregateRecords(
    -                                           getRecordsResult.getRecords(),
    -                                           
subscribedShard.getShard().getHashKeyRange().getStartingHashKey(),
    -                                           
subscribedShard.getShard().getHashKeyRange().getEndingHashKey());
    +                   while(isRunning()) {
    +                           UserRecord record = queue.poll();
    +                           if (record != null) {
    +                                   
deserializeRecordForCollectionAndUpdateState(record);
    +                           } else {
    +                                   if (shardConsumerFetcher.nextShardItr 
== null) {
    +                                           
fetcherRef.updateState(subscribedShardStateIndex, 
SentinelSequenceNumber.SENTINEL_SHARD_ENDING_SEQUENCE_NUM.get());
     
    -                                   for (UserRecord record : 
fetchedRecords) {
    -                                           
deserializeRecordForCollectionAndUpdateState(record);
    +                                           // we can close this consumer 
thread once we've reached the end of the subscribed shard
    +                                           break;
                                        }
    +                           }
     
    -                                   nextShardItr = 
getRecordsResult.getNextShardIterator();
    +                           Throwable throwable = this.error.get();
    +                           if (throwable != null) {
    +                                   throw throwable;
                                }
                        }
                } catch (Throwable t) {
                        fetcherRef.stopWithError(t);
    +           } finally {
    +                   timer.cancel();
    +           }
    +   }
    +
    +   private class ShardConsumerFetcher extends TimerTask {
    +           private String nextShardItr;
    +
    +           private final ShardConsumer<T> shardConsumerRef;
    +
    +           private final ArrayBlockingQueue<UserRecord> userRecordQueue;
    +
    +           /** The latest finish time for fetching data from Kinesis used 
to recognize if the following task has been delayed.*/
    +           private Long lastFinishTime = -1L;
    +
    +           private boolean runForever;
    +
    +           ShardConsumerFetcher(ShardConsumer<T> shardConsumerRef,
    +                                                   String nextShardItr,
    +                                                   
ArrayBlockingQueue<UserRecord> userRecordQueue,
    +                                                   boolean runForever) {
    +                   this.shardConsumerRef = shardConsumerRef;
    +                   this.nextShardItr = nextShardItr;
    +                   this.userRecordQueue = userRecordQueue;
    +                   this.runForever = runForever;
    +           }
    +
    +           @Override
    +           public void run() {
    +                   try {
    +                           do {
    +                                   if (nextShardItr != null) {
    +                                           // ignore to log this warning 
if runForever is true, since fetchIntervalMillis is 0
    +                                           if (!runForever && 
this.scheduledExecutionTime() < lastFinishTime) {
    +                                                   // If expected 
scheduled execution time is earlier than lastFinishTime,
    +                                                   // it seems that the 
fetchIntervalMillis might be short to finish the previous task.
    +                                                   LOG.warn("The value 
given for ShardConsumer is too short to finish getRecords on time. Please 
increase the value set in config \"{}\"", 
ConsumerConfigConstants.SHARD_GETRECORDS_INTERVAL_MILLIS);
    --- End diff --
    
    I would not use a "recommend change to configuration" message as warning 
here, because the user can't really change the setting while the job is still 
running. An informative message just explaining that fetch took longer than the 
fetch interval is fine.


> Strengthen fetch interval implementation in Kinesis consumer
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4574
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4574
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Kinesis Connector
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Assignee: Wei-Che Wei
>
> As pointed out by [~rmetzger], right now the fetch interval implementation in 
> the {{ShardConsumer}} class of the Kinesis consumer can lead to much longer 
> interval times than specified by the user, ex. say the specified fetch 
> interval is {{f}}, it takes {{x}} to complete a {{getRecords()}} call, and 
> {{y}} to complete processing the fetched records for emitting, than the 
> actual interval between each fetch is actually {{f+x+y}}.
> The main problem with this is that we can never guarantee how much time has 
> past since the last {{getRecords}} call, thus can not guarantee that returned 
> shard iterators will not have expired the next time we use them, even if we 
> limit the user-given value for {{f}} to not be longer than the iterator 
> expire time.
> I propose to improve this by, per {{ShardConsumer}}, use a 
> {{ScheduledExecutorService}} / {{Timer}} to do the fixed-interval fetching, 
> and a separate blocking queue that collects the fetched records for emitting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to