[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-41310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bonnie Varghese updated FLINK-41310:
------------------------------------
    Summary: BatchExecAdaptiveJoin should take external-buffer-memory from the 
compiled plan  (was:  BatchExecAdaptiveJoin sizes the external buffer from the 
runtime config instead of the compiled plan)

> BatchExecAdaptiveJoin should take external-buffer-memory from the compiled 
> plan
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-41310
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-41310
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table SQL / Planner
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Bonnie Varghese
>            Assignee: Bonnie Varghese
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>
> BatchExecAdaptiveJoin computes the join's managed memory from the compiled 
> plan's config. It builds the actual join operator at runtime, though, and 
> that operator reads 
> `table.exec.resource.external-buffer-memory` from the config of the session 
> that executes the plan.
> If the two sessions use different values, the buffer no longer fits the 
> budget. There are two problems associated with this:
> 1. A large enough value fails the job with "Memory size is too small".
> 2. A smaller difference just takes memory from the sorters without any error.
> BatchExecHashJoin and BatchExecSortMergeJoin aren't affected, because they 
> read both values from the plan. This should be fixed after FLINK-41263 is 
> merged.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to