[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880282#comment-15880282
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5827:
---------------------------------------
Github user kaibozhou commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3357#discussion_r102693470
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/batch/sql/TableWithSQLITCase.scala
---
@@ -113,4 +114,26 @@ class TableWithSQLITCase(
val results = result.toDataSet[Row].collect()
TestBaseUtils.compareResultAsText(results.asJava, expected)
}
+
+ @Test
+ def testUDTFWithPojoType(): Unit = {
--- End diff --
I found there was already a testPojoType case in
DataSetUserDefinedFunctionITCase, so I extend it. And I extend testCrossJoin in
DataStreamUserDefinedFunctionITCase, do you think it's OK?
> Exception when do filter after join a udtf which returns a POJO type
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5827
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5827
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Kaibo Zhou
> Assignee: Kaibo Zhou
>
> The test case:
> {code:title=testFilterUdtfOutputPojo}
> @Test
> def testFilterUdtfOutputPojo(): Unit = {
> val env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment
> val tEnv = TableEnvironment.getTableEnvironment(env)
> val pojoFunc1 = new PojoTableFunc()
> tEnv.registerFunction("pojo1", pojoFunc1)
> val result = CollectionDataSets.getSmall3TupleDataSet(env)
> .toTable(tEnv, 'a, 'b, 'c)
> .join(pojoFunc1('c))
> .where(('age > 0) && ('name !== ""))
> .select('a, 'b, 'c, 'age, 'name)
> val results = result.toDataSet[Row].collect()
> }
> {code}
> It will throw exception:
> {code}
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenException: No input mapping is
> specified for input1 of type POJO.
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator$$anonfun$1.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:80)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator$$anonfun$1.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:80)
> at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator.<init>(CodeGenerator.scala:79)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.CommonCorrelate$class.generateCollector(CommonCorrelate.scala:191)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetCorrelate.generateCollector(DataSetCorrelate.scala:37)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.CommonCorrelate$class.correlateMapFunction(CommonCorrelate.scala:70)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetCorrelate.correlateMapFunction(DataSetCorrelate.scala:37)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetCorrelate.translateToPlan(DataSetCorrelate.scala:101)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.api.BatchTableEnvironment.translate(BatchTableEnvironment.scala:277)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.api.BatchTableEnvironment.translate(BatchTableEnvironment.scala:256)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.api.scala.BatchTableEnvironment.toDataSet(BatchTableEnvironment.scala:140)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.api.scala.TableConversions.toDataSet(TableConversions.scala:40)
> at
> org.apache.flink.table.api.scala.stream.table.UserDefinedTableFunctionTest.testFilterUdtfOutputPojo(UserDefinedTableFunctionTest.scala:399)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)