[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15882268#comment-15882268
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3679:
---------------------------------------
Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3314#discussion_r102901123
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-base/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/FlinkKafkaConsumerBaseMigrationTest.java
---
@@ -171,8 +171,9 @@ private static String getResourceFilename(String
filename) {
private final List<KafkaTopicPartition> partitions;
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
- DummyFlinkKafkaConsumer(List<KafkaTopicPartition> partitions) {
- super(Arrays.asList("dummy-topic"),
(KeyedDeserializationSchema< T >) mock(KeyedDeserializationSchema.class));
+ DummyFlinkKafkaConsumer(
+ List<KafkaTopicPartition> partitions) {
--- End diff --
If its just one parameter, I don't think we need a new line.
> DeserializationSchema should handle zero or more outputs for every input
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3679
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: DataStream API, Kafka Connector
> Reporter: Jamie Grier
> Assignee: Haohui Mai
>
> There are a couple of issues with the DeserializationSchema API that I think
> should be improved. This request has come to me via an existing Flink user.
> The main issue is simply that the API assumes that there is a one-to-one
> mapping between input and outputs. In reality there are scenarios where one
> input message (say from Kafka) might actually map to zero or more logical
> elements in the pipeline.
> Particularly important here is the case where you receive a message from a
> source (such as Kafka) and say the raw bytes don't deserialize properly.
> Right now the only recourse is to throw IOException and therefore fail the
> job.
> This is definitely not good since bad data is a reality and failing the job
> is not the right option. If the job fails we'll just end up replaying the
> bad data and the whole thing will start again.
> Instead in this case it would be best if the user could just return the empty
> set.
> The other case is where one input message should logically be multiple output
> messages. This case is probably less important since there are other ways to
> do this but in general it might be good to make the
> DeserializationSchema.deserialize() method return a collection rather than a
> single element.
> Maybe we need to support a DeserializationSchema variant that has semantics
> more like that of FlatMap.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
