[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15889878#comment-15889878
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5402:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3430#discussion_r103646797
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/rpc/akka/AkkaRpcServiceTest.java
---
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ public void testGetAddress() {
* @throws ExecutionException
* @throws InterruptedException
*/
- @Test(timeout = 1000)
+ @Test
--- End diff --
It should be ok to remove the timeout, but I think that the build timeout
stack traces are not so nice to see which test case actually caused the
timeout. The reason for this is that there are multiple test cases being
executed in parallel.
> Fails AkkaRpcServiceTest#testTerminationFuture
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5402
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Distributed Coordination
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0
> Environment: macOS
> Reporter: Anton Solovev
> Assignee: Dawid Wysakowicz
> Labels: test-stability
>
> {code}
> testTerminationFuture(org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcServiceTest)
> Time elapsed: 1.013 sec <<< ERROR!
> org.junit.runners.model.TestTimedOutException: test timed out after 1000
> milliseconds
> at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1037)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryAwait(Promise.scala:208)
> at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.ready(Promise.scala:218)
> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.result(Promise.scala:223)
> at scala.concurrent.Await$$anonfun$result$1.apply(package.scala:107)
> at
> scala.concurrent.BlockContext$DefaultBlockContext$.blockOn(BlockContext.scala:53)
> at scala.concurrent.Await$.result(package.scala:107)
> at akka.remote.Remoting.start(Remoting.scala:179)
> at
> akka.remote.RemoteActorRefProvider.init(RemoteActorRefProvider.scala:184)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystemImpl.liftedTree2$1(ActorSystem.scala:620)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystemImpl._start$lzycompute(ActorSystem.scala:617)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystemImpl._start(ActorSystem.scala:617)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystemImpl.start(ActorSystem.scala:634)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystem$.apply(ActorSystem.scala:142)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystem$.apply(ActorSystem.scala:119)
> at akka.actor.ActorSystem$.create(ActorSystem.scala:67)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.akka.AkkaUtils$.createActorSystem(AkkaUtils.scala:104)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.akka.AkkaUtils$.createDefaultActorSystem(AkkaUtils.scala:114)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.akka.AkkaUtils.createDefaultActorSystem(AkkaUtils.scala)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcServiceTest.testTerminationFuture(AkkaRpcServiceTest.java:134)
> {code} in org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcServiceTest while testing
> current master 1.2.0 branch
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
