[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15898438#comment-15898438
]
Jamie Grier commented on FLINK-3026:
------------------------------------
[~iemejia] [~plucas] I'm definitely also for the #2 option above. We should
definitely create an Official Flink Docker Image.
I also agree with getting rid of the bluemix files but I'm not so sure about
having multiple base images. Is that truly a common practice?
I also think your labelling scheme looks reasonable - a full spec plus some
defaults to make it simple to just grab the latest Flink image.
> Publish the flink docker container to the docker registry
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3026
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build System, Docker
> Reporter: Omer Katz
> Assignee: Ismaël Mejía
> Labels: Deployment, Docker
>
> There's a dockerfile that can be used to build a docker container already in
> the repository. It'd be awesome to just be able to pull it instead of
> building it ourselves.
> The dockerfile can be found at
> https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-contrib/docker-flink
> It also doesn't point to the latest version of Flink which I fixed in
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1366
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
