[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15902852#comment-15902852
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5715:
---------------------------------------
Github user StefanRRichter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3466#discussion_r105131028
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/heap/HeapListStateTest.java
---
@@ -233,7 +231,8 @@ public void testMerging() throws Exception {
StringSerializer.INSTANCE,
HeapListStateTest.class.getClassLoader(),
16,
- new KeyGroupRange(0, 15));
+ new KeyGroupRange(0, 15),
+ (System.currentTimeMillis() & 1) == 1);
--- End diff --
Good idea.
> Asynchronous snapshotting for HeapKeyedStateBackend
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5715
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5715
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Stefan Richter
> Assignee: Stefan Richter
>
> Blocking snapshots render the HeapKeyedStateBackend practically unusable for
> many user in productions. Their jobs can not tolerate stopped processing for
> the time it takes to write gigabytes of data from memory to disk.
> Asynchronous snapshots would be a solution to this problem. The challenge for
> the implementation is coming up with a copy-on-write scheme for the in-memory
> hash maps that build the foundation of this backend. After taking a closer
> look, this problem is twofold. First, providing CoW semantics for the hashmap
> itself, as a mutible structure, thereby avoiding costly locking or blocking
> where possible. Second, CoW for the mutable value objects, e.g. through
> cloning via serializers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
