[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15931247#comment-15931247
 ] 

zhijiang commented on FLINK-4545:
---------------------------------

[~StephanEwen], thank you for so rich information! 
I agree with the above points and know well the considerations and future plans!
The current constant global buffer amount is replaced by the flexible minimum 
and maximum range, which is especially helpful for current batch jobs and 
future better recovery for streaming. Wish to see the changes quickly and 
participate in related parts!

> Flink automatically manages TM network buffer
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4545
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4545
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Network
>            Reporter: Zhenzhong Xu
>
> Currently, the number of network buffer per task manager is preconfigured and 
> the memory is pre-allocated through taskmanager.network.numberOfBuffers 
> config. In a Job DAG with shuffle phase, this number can go up very high 
> depends on the TM cluster size. The formula for calculating the buffer count 
> is documented here 
> (https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/config.html#configuring-the-network-buffers).
>   
> #slots-per-TM^2 * #TMs * 4
> In a standalone deployment, we may need to control the task manager cluster 
> size dynamically and then leverage the up-coming Flink feature to support 
> scaling job parallelism/rescaling at runtime. 
> If the buffer count config is static at runtime and cannot be changed without 
> restarting task manager process, this may add latency and complexity for 
> scaling process. I am wondering if there is already any discussion around 
> whether the network buffer should be automatically managed by Flink or at 
> least expose some API to allow it to be reconfigured. Let me know if there is 
> any existing JIRA that I should follow.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to