Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3550#discussion_r107024511
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/stream/sql/SqlITCase.scala
 ---
    @@ -317,4 +317,92 @@ class SqlITCase extends StreamingWithStateTestBase {
         result.addSink(new StreamITCase.StringSink)
         env.execute()
       }
    +  
    +  
    +  @Test
    +  def testAvgSumAggregatationPartition(): Unit = {
    +
    +    val env = StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment
    +    val tEnv = TableEnvironment.getTableEnvironment(env)
    +    env.setParallelism(1)
    +    StreamITCase.testResults = mutable.MutableList()
    +
    +    val sqlQuery = "SELECT a, AVG(c) OVER (PARTITION BY a ORDER BY 
procTime()" +
    +      "RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '10' SECOND PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS 
avgC," + 
    +      "SUM(c) OVER (PARTITION BY a ORDER BY procTime()" +
    +      "RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '10' SECOND PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) as 
sumC FROM MyTable"
    +
    +    val t = StreamTestData.get5TupleDataStream(env)
    +         .assignTimestampsAndWatermarks(new ProcTimeTimestamp())
    --- End diff --
    
    We should not require to set timestamps for a processing time window.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to