[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15933673#comment-15933673
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5654:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3550#discussion_r107023660
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/DataStreamProcTimeAggregateWindowFunction.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.flink.table.runtime.aggregate
+
+import java.lang.Iterable
+
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.tuple.Tuple
+import org.apache.flink.types.Row
+import org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration
+import
org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.windowing.RichWindowFunction
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.windowing.windows.Window
+import org.apache.flink.util.Collector
+import org.apache.flink.table.functions.AggregateFunction
+import org.apache.flink.table.functions.Accumulator
+
+/**
+ * Computes the final aggregate value from incrementally computed
aggreagtes.
+ *
+ * @param aggregates The aggregates to be computed
+ * @param aggFields the fields on which to apply the aggregate.
+ * @param forwardedFieldCount The fields to be carried from current row.
+ */
+class DataStreamProcTimeAggregateWindowFunction[W <: Window](
+ private val aggregates: Array[AggregateFunction[_]],
+ private val aggFields: Array[Int],
+ private val forwardedFieldCount: Int)
+ extends RichWindowFunction[Row, Row, Tuple, W] {
+
+private var output: Row = _
+private var accumulators: Row= _
+
+ override def open(parameters: Configuration): Unit = {
+ output = new Row(forwardedFieldCount + aggregates.length)
+ accumulators = new Row(aggregates.length)
+ var i = 0
+ while (i < aggregates.length) {
+ accumulators.setField(i, aggregates(i).createAccumulator())
+ i = i + 1
--- End diff --
`i += 1`
> Add processing time OVER RANGE BETWEEN x PRECEDING aggregation to SQL
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5654
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: radu
>
> The goal of this issue is to add support for OVER RANGE aggregations on
> processing time streams to the SQL interface.
> Queries similar to the following should be supported:
> {code}
> SELECT
> a,
> SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '1'
> HOUR PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS sumB,
> MIN(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '1'
> HOUR PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS minB
> FROM myStream
> {code}
> The following restrictions should initially apply:
> - All OVER clauses in the same SELECT clause must be exactly the same.
> - The PARTITION BY clause is optional (no partitioning results in single
> threaded execution).
> - The ORDER BY clause may only have procTime() as parameter. procTime() is a
> parameterless scalar function that just indicates processing time mode.
> - UNBOUNDED PRECEDING is not supported (see FLINK-5657)
> - FOLLOWING is not supported.
> The restrictions will be resolved in follow up issues. If we find that some
> of the restrictions are trivial to address, we can add the functionality in
> this issue as well.
> This issue includes:
> - Design of the DataStream operator to compute OVER ROW aggregates
> - Translation from Calcite's RelNode representation (LogicalProject with
> RexOver expression).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
