[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947512#comment-15947512
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5654:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3641#discussion_r108721762
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/AggregateUtil.scala
 ---
    @@ -1208,5 +1208,40 @@ object AggregateUtil {
       private def gcd(a: Long, b: Long): Long = {
         if (b == 0) a else gcd(b, a % b)
       }
    -}
    +  
    +  /**
    +   * Create an 
[[org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.ProcessFunction]] to evaluate final
    +   * aggregate value over a window with processing time boundaries.
    +   *
    +   * @param namedAggregates List of calls to aggregate functions and their 
output field names
    +   * @param inputType Input row type
    +   * @param timeBoundary time limit of the window boundary expressed in 
milliseconds
    +   * @param isPartitioned Flag to indicate whether the input is 
partitioned or not
    +   * @return [[org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.ProcessFunction]]
    +   */
    +  private[flink] def createTimeBoundedProcessingOverProcessFunction(
    +    namedAggregates: Seq[CalcitePair[AggregateCall, String]],
    +    inputType: RelDataType,
    +    timeBoundary: Long,
    +    isPartitioned: Boolean = true): ProcessFunction[Row, Row] = {
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, it is not used in the function. Removing it should be fine.


> Add processing time OVER RANGE BETWEEN x PRECEDING aggregation to SQL
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5654
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5654
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: radu
>
> The goal of this issue is to add support for OVER RANGE aggregations on 
> processing time streams to the SQL interface.
> Queries similar to the following should be supported:
> {code}
> SELECT 
>   a, 
>   SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '1' 
> HOUR PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS sumB,
>   MIN(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '1' 
> HOUR PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS minB
> FROM myStream
> {code}
> The following restrictions should initially apply:
> - All OVER clauses in the same SELECT clause must be exactly the same.
> - The PARTITION BY clause is optional (no partitioning results in single 
> threaded execution).
> - The ORDER BY clause may only have procTime() as parameter. procTime() is a 
> parameterless scalar function that just indicates processing time mode.
> - UNBOUNDED PRECEDING is not supported (see FLINK-5657)
> - FOLLOWING is not supported.
> The restrictions will be resolved in follow up issues. If we find that some 
> of the restrictions are trivial to address, we can add the functionality in 
> this issue as well.
> This issue includes:
> - Design of the DataStream operator to compute OVER ROW aggregates
> - Translation from Calcite's RelNode representation (LogicalProject with 
> RexOver expression).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to