[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14229829#comment-14229829
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1293:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/243#issuecomment-65070889
Thanks for your pull request!
Great piece of work. Well commented, plenty of tests, nice!
Apart from Scala API support, there are several ways how this PR could be
extended:
1. Extend aggregation support for Flink's mutable value types (IntValue,
DoubleValue, ...), i.e., sum() and avg() on numeric *Value types
2. Add support for POJO data types and allowing aggregations of their
members (output would still be tuples). This would mean to extract the
aggregation fields by name in the initial Map operator.
3. Do the aggregations internally on *Value types, which would mean to
transform Java Standard types into *Values in the first Map operator. This
would reduce object allocations and GC pressure.
The question is how much do we want to squeeze into this PR.
I'd say let's add support for Scala and treat the other issues as
improvements over this work.
@he-sk If you want to try the Scala API support, you could have a look at
how the old Aggregation operator was ported.
> Add support for out-of-place aggregations
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1293
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java API, Scala API
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0-incubating
> Reporter: Viktor Rosenfeld
> Assignee: Viktor Rosenfeld
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, the output of an aggregation is of the same type as the input.
> This restriction has to major drawbacks:
> 1. Every tuple field can only be used in one aggregation because the
> aggregations result is stored in the field.
> 2. Aggregations having a return type that is different from the input type,
> e.g., count or average, cannot be implemented.
> It would be nice to have the aggregation return any kind of tuple as a
> result, so the restrictions above no longer apply.
> See also:
> -
> https://github.com/stratosphere/stratosphere/wiki/Design-of-Aggregate-Operator
> -
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Hi-Aggregation-support-td2311.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)