platinumhamburg opened a new pull request, #2394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/2394

   
   This commit adds configuration options to control how RocksDB handles index 
and filter blocks in the block cache:
   
   - kv.rocksdb.block.cache-index-and-filter-blocks: Store index/filter blocks 
in block cache to limit memory usage (default: false)
   - kv.rocksdb.block.cache-index-and-filter-blocks-with-high-priority: Give 
index/filter blocks high priority in cache (default: false)
   - kv.rocksdb.block.pin-l0-filter-and-index-blocks-in-cache: Pin L0 
index/filter blocks to avoid eviction (default: false)
   - kv.rocksdb.block.pin-top-level-index-and-filter: Pin top-level partitioned 
index/filter blocks (default: false)
   
   These options help users control RocksDB memory usage by allowing index and 
filter blocks to be managed within the block cache, preventing unbounded memory 
growth.
   
   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to Fluss - we are happy that you want 
to help us improve Fluss. To help the community review your contribution in the 
best possible way, please go through the checklist below, which will get the 
contribution into a shape in which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   ## Contribution Checklist
   
     - Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [GitHub 
issue](https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues). Exceptions are made for typos 
in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no issue.
   
     - Name the pull request in the format "[component] Title of the pull 
request", where *[component]* should be replaced by the name of the component 
being changed. Typically, this corresponds to the component label assigned to 
the issue (e.g., [kv], [log], [client], [flink]). Skip *[component]* if you are 
unsure about which is the best component.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
   
     - Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean 
verify` passes.
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
   
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes or typos)**
   -->
   
   ### Purpose
   
   <!-- Linking this pull request to the issue -->
   Linked issue: close #2393 2393
   
   <!-- What is the purpose of the change -->
   
   ### Brief change log
   
   <!-- Please describe the changes made in this pull request and explain how 
they address the issue -->
   
   ### Tests
   
   <!-- List UT and IT cases to verify this change -->
   
   ### API and Format
   
   <!-- Does this change affect API or storage format -->
   
   ### Documentation
   
   <!-- Does this change introduce a new feature -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to