gyang94 commented on PR #3359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/3359#issuecomment-4554886565

   Hi @lilei1128 , thanks for your contribution to fix this issue. Glad to see 
you are interested in this task.
   
   In your PR, it is a good thinking to reuse the existing retry mechanism to 
solve this problem. However, the current retry loop doesn't truly solve the 
problem. The retry loop has no delay between attempts, so it degrades to "fail 
5 times in milliseconds → pretend success → data residue on disk."
   
   I'd like to solve this problem by introducing "**per-TS sender**" + 
"**ReplicaDeletionIneligible state**": 
   - Per-TS sender thread gives each TabletServer an independent request queue 
with backoff-aware retry. A temporarily unreachable TS doesn't burn through 
retry attempts instantly — the sender sleeps and retries over a meaningful time 
window.
   - ReplicaDeletionIneligible state breaks the current all-or-nothing dilemma. 
Instead of   force-marking unreachable replicas as successfully deleted, they 
enter Ineligible —   which (1) unblocks isEligibleForDeletion (since Ineligible 
≠ DeletionStarted, resumeDeletions is no longer stuck), and (2) preserves the 
truth that deletion hasn't happened yet. When the TS comes back online, 
replicas transition Ineligible → OfflineReplica → ReplicaDeletionStarted and 
get genuinely deleted. 
   
   If you are interested, welcome to review this 
[PR](https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/3391), leave any comments there, or 
help to push code to fix based on it. 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to