litiliu commented on issue #3495: URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues/3495#issuecomment-4740806816
> Definitely in line with the current Kafka implementation, I think it makes sense. > > [@litiliu](https://github.com/litiliu) is there any issue around for SCRAM as well? Are you planning that one to? Thanks for the feedback. I haven't found a dedicated SCRAM issue yet. I agree SCRAM would also fit well into the same direction, especially if we first make the SASL mechanism layer extensible instead of hard-coding PLAIN. My current plan is to focus on OAUTHBEARER first because it is the immediate requirement I am looking at. But I think the first step should be a small refactor that allows multiple SASL mechanisms to be plugged in cleanly. After that, SCRAM-SHA-256/SCRAM-SHA-512 could be added as another mechanism in a separate issue/PR. I can open a separate feature issue for SCRAM as well, so the scope of this one stays focused on OAUTHBEARER. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
