[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16070506#comment-16070506
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-3128:
---------------------------------------
Github user upthewaterspout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/603#discussion_r125094490
--- Diff:
geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesIntegrationTest.java
---
@@ -59,7 +64,7 @@
@Rule
public ExpectedException thrown = ExpectedException.none();
private static final String INDEX_NAME = "index";
- protected static final String REGION_NAME = "index";
+ public static final String REGION_NAME = "index";
--- End diff --
I don't think this needed to be made public - I think maybe the new test is
importing the wrong static REGION_NAME?
> Tuning batch size for less index overhead
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-3128
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3128
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
> Reporter: David Anuta
> Assignee: David Anuta
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> Tuning the batch size set when creating the AEQFactory from 100 to 1000. This
> significantly decreases the per entry overhead of indexes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
