[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16414171#comment-16414171
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-4928:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 3c65d9b296569cc2a769187881ab14c6fe3c9a93 in geode's branch 
refs/heads/feature/GEODE-4928b from [~bschuchardt]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=3c65d9b ]

GEODE-4928 DistributedLockService doesn't work as expected while the dlock 
grantor is initialized

Moved setting of the in-process state to a point before we launch the
background thread to do the cleanup.  Added in-line cleanup with a warning
message if background execution is rejected and we aren't shutting down.

If we _are_ shutting down the in-process state is left being set to true
so that lockers won't get a spurious conflict exception from the grantor
and will retry their commits with a new grantor when one is created.


> DistributedLockService doesn't work as expected while the dlock grantor is 
> initialized
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-4928
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4928
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: distributed lock service
>            Reporter: Bruce Schuchardt
>            Assignee: Bruce Schuchardt
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I wrote a function that obtained a dlock and then performed a transaction.  
> It always operates on the same dlock key and the same keys in my region.  
> That protects against getting a commit conflict exception BUT this sometimes 
> fails if the JVM holding the lock crashes.  One of the functions appears to 
> get the dlock okay but then its transaction fails when it goes to commit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to