[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-5596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16594079#comment-16594079
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-5596:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 47dc37b4b318b050c3e1356c947d10a8f582763d in geode's branch 
refs/heads/feature/GEODE-5596 from [~bschuchardt]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=47dc37b ]

Merge branch 'feature/GEODE-5596' of ssh://github.com/apache/geode into 
feature/GEODE-5596


> Client ends up with destroyed entry after invalidate()
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-5596
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-5596
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regions
>            Reporter: Bruce Schuchardt
>            Assignee: Bruce Schuchardt
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If a client is doing a destroy, putAll and invalidate in separate threads and 
> the events align like this in the server: destroy then create then 
> invalidate, the client may end up having a destroyed entry instead of an 
> invalid entry.
> This is a long standing issue with Geode (and formerly with GemFire) that a 
> client does not create an Invalid entry in some situations.  A lot of this 
> was cleared up when we implemented concurrency controls in the cache but this 
> one corner case remains.
> Fixing this issue requires a small change in behavior for client caches in 
> how they handle the invalidate() operation, but I think it's a change for the 
> better.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to