[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16687288#comment-16687288
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-6058:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 9c88962530f4ad9986546fe3a56da102dcbaf7b0 in geode's branch
refs/heads/feature/GEODE-6058 from zhouxh
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=9c88962 ]
GEODE-6058: recordVersion should allow update higher local version if for
non-persistent region
> recordVersion should allow update higher local version if for non-persistent
> region
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-6058
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6058
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: xiaojian zhou
> Assignee: xiaojian zhou
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available, swat
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When we introduced RVV, we put an assertion to disallow recordVersion to be a
> higher local version. i.e. the local version should be increased by local
> member, not from remote (such as GII).
>
> But we forgot to enforce this assertion for persistent region only.
>
> The reason is: If in persist region, the operation increased local version
> and persist it first before sending out distribution. And it will recover
> from disk. So there's no reason for a persistent region to get a higher local
> version from remote (such as GII).
>
> But this is not the case for non-persistent region.
>
> If we have a non-persistent region with concurrencyCheckEnabled, memberA
> initiated an operation and distributed to remote. The remote member keeps
> memberA's region version as 1. If we destroy and recreate region on memberA,
> it cannot recover from disk. The only way to get RVV back is through GII from
> remote. So we have to allow updating region version 1 for memberA into
> memberA's empty RVV.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
