[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16711883#comment-16711883
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-6151:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit dfaf11c121e0bf0ebec63d2f22a46fe620fa2ce5 in geode's branch
refs/heads/feature/GEODE-6149 from [~dschneider]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=dfaf11c ]
GEODE-6151: use same term for JDBC mapping (#2957)
> The jdbc-mapping commands should use consistent terminology when referring to
> a jdbc mapping
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-6151
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6151
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: extensions
> Reporter: Darrel Schneider
> Assignee: Darrel Schneider
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Multiple gfsh jdbc-mapping commands exist. They currently use the following
> terms to refer to a jdbc-mapping: "mapping", "region mapping", and "JDBC
> mapping". They should consistently use the term "JDBC mapping".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
