[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bill Burcham updated GEODE-6410:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: image-2019-02-25-10-38-24-493.png

> review use of putIfAbsent
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-6410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6410
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general
>            Reporter: Jason Huynh
>            Assignee: Bill Burcham
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2019-02-25-10-38-24-493.png
>
>
> Usages of putIfAbsent in Geode on ConcurrentHashMap may not have realized the 
> actual synchronized/atomic nature of the putIfAbsent.  See 
> [https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6737839]
> This ticket is for someone to review or possibly change the putIfAbsent 
> usages to be more performant. 
> Not sure if putIfAbsent is called enough and under contention enough for this 
> to matter...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to