[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17155594#comment-17155594
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-8349:
---------------------------------------

pivotal-jbarrett commented on pull request #5363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5363#issuecomment-656765432


   In response to the benchmark results, the values are within the margin of 
error for benchmarks. The get benchmarks would not much if any P2P operations. 
Put benchmarks would have 1 P2P op per client/server put op and likely 
bottlenecked by the p2p operation. There are currently no benchmarks that 
measure P2P operations in isolation. 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> reinstate use of SSLSocket for cluster communication
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-8349
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8349
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: membership, messaging
>            Reporter: Bruce J Schuchardt
>            Assignee: Bruce J Schuchardt
>            Priority: Major
>
> We've found problems with "new IO"'s SSLEngine with respect to support for 
> TLSV1.  We've also seen anomalous performance using that secure 
> communications mechanism.  The introduction of the use of the "new IO" 
> SSLEngine was originally to 1) reduce code complexity in the 
> org.apache.geode.internal.tcp package and 2) to set the stage for its use in 
> client/server communications so that selectors could be used in c/s 
> communications.
> This ticket aims to reintroduce the use of SSLSocket in cluster 
> communications without restoring the old, poorly tested SSL code paths.  The 
> new implementation should have as good or better performance than the 
> previous"old IO" implementation and the more recent "new IO" SSLEngine 
> implementation as well.  This should be apparent in the CI benchmark jobs.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to