[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17270330#comment-17270330
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-8824:
---------------------------------------
onichols-pivotal commented on pull request #5934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5934#issuecomment-765588723
> Since it looks like you are restricting the list of owners for CODEOWNERS
and .asf.yml in this PR, should this have a dev list discussion?
That seems reasonable. The question was previously asked on the dev list
"who owns the CODEOWNERS file" but never answered...
CODEOWNERS is currently ownerless since the syntax Robert tried didn't work.
I'd like to be tagged on any modification just to review that changes are
syntactically sound, minimum of 2 owners is maintained, formatting is
consistent, and all owners are committers. I have no desire to interfere with
any actual changes in ownership. But I would also be fine with keeping
CODEOWNERS ownerless if that is perceived as the only democratic solution.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> fix CODEOWNERS rules
> --------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-8824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8824
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: github
> Reporter: Owen Nichols
> Assignee: Owen Nichols
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> We are finding some quirks in how GitHub parses the rules in CODEOWNERS. It
> seems to not support paths containing {{/**/}} and also a few rules were not
> ordered correctly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
