[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14622703#comment-14622703
]
Anthony Baker commented on GEODE-37:
------------------------------------
Yes. As noted in [1] we may choose to avoid renaming certain classes used in
Client/Server messaging to avoid breaking backwards compatibility.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201507.mbox/%3ccaghyz6kr2dtumclcojasa0as4xqnzqd75za92xt4mmq7f57...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> Package renaming
> ----------------
>
> Key: GEODE-37
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-37
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core, general
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0-incubating
> Reporter: William Markito Oliveira
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.0.0-incubating
>
>
> Geode packages should be renamed from com.gemstone -> org.apache.geode in
> order to allow an easy transition from incubation to become a TLP.
> Also, it allow the necessary work that may need to be done at the protocol
> level in order to allow serialization/message exchange between nodes before
> an actual release using the definitive class/package naming.
> The issue was discussed in the following thread at dev@:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/ajax/%3C554B38C3.5050500%40pidster.com%3E
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
