[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15246706#comment-15246706
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-1190:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 58caa328a6eabc2a33cbb8b834340a2272e1f1aa in incubator-geode's branch
refs/heads/develop from [~nnag]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-geode.git;h=58caa32 ]
GEODE-1190: LuceneServiceProvider.get now accepts GemFireCache as a parameter.
* Modified the LuceneServiceProvider.get function signature to use GemFireCache
as a parameter.
* Wrote a small test case to check that LuceneServiceProvider.get does not
return null when ClientCache is passed as a parameter.
This closes #129
> Should the LuceneServiceProvider get API take a GemFireCache instead of a
> Cache?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-1190
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1190
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
> Reporter: Barry Oglesby
>
> Should the LuceneServiceProvider get API take a GemFireCache instead of a
> Cache?
> The {{LuceneServiceProvider get}} API takes a {{Cache}} like:
> {noformat}
> public static LuceneService get(Cache cache)
> {noformat}
> If I create a {{ClientCache}}, I can't pass that into this method.
> Code like this doesn't compile:
> {noformat}
> ClientCache cache = new ClientCacheFactory().create();
> LuceneService luceneService = LuceneServiceProvider.get(cache);
> {noformat}
> Instead I have to cast the {{ClientCache}} to a {{Cache}}, but that doesn't
> seem right:
> {noformat}
> ClientCache clientCache = new ClientCacheFactory().create();
> LuceneService luceneService = LuceneServiceProvider.get((Cache) clientCache);
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
