[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ruilong Huo updated HAWQ-170:
-----------------------------
    Description: GUC gp_vmem_protect_limit was used as vmem memory quota per 
HAWQ segment. Now, we implemented resource enforcement but leveraging 
gp_vmem_protect_limit as the GUC for maximum overcommit of memory quota per 
HAWQ physical segment. It should be renamed to hawq_re_memory_overcommit_max to 
reflect that.  (was: GUC gp_vmem_protect_limit was used as vmem memory quota 
for HAWQ segment in 1.x. In HAWQ 2.0, we implemented resource enforcement but 
leveraging gp_vmem_protect_limit as the GUC for maximum overcommit of memory 
quota per HAWQ physical segment. It should be renamed to 
hawq_re_memory_overcommit_max to reflect that.)

> Rename GUC gp_vmem_protect_limit to hawq_re_memory_overcommit_max to reflect 
> latest memory enforcement implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAWQ-170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-170
>             Project: Apache HAWQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Resource Manager
>            Reporter: Ruilong Huo
>            Assignee: Ruilong Huo
>
> GUC gp_vmem_protect_limit was used as vmem memory quota per HAWQ segment. 
> Now, we implemented resource enforcement but leveraging gp_vmem_protect_limit 
> as the GUC for maximum overcommit of memory quota per HAWQ physical segment. 
> It should be renamed to hawq_re_memory_overcommit_max to reflect that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to