[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12884826#action_12884826
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-2811:
--------------------------------------
We should definitely do #1. +1 on configurable like ZK and also pre-configured
HDFS.
I think #2 could be interesting but I'm not sure in which contexts it makes
sense. Single node, yeah. But if you have a cluster it seems like you benefit
from multiple JVMs. Is it really that much more simple to launch a cluster of
one process per server vs two or three?
Are there some benefits I'm not thinking about?
> Offer a fully integrated Hadoop+HBase+ZooKeeper solution
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2811
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2811
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> As dicussed at the Hadoop Summit and HUG11, we could improve usability a lot
> simply by shipping with all the required components and manage them all. I
> see two way of doing this:
> # We keep all components separated and start/stop them in the right order.
> It would be much easier for us to develop but it would be much less friendly
> to use than the next solution.
> # Integrate the DNs and TTs with the RSs, the NN, the JT and a ZK quorum
> member with the master. I'm not sure if it's easily doable but that's what we
> do for our unit tests so it must be possible.
> Then we need to make sure that we have options to disable that management
> like we currently do for ZK.
> This would also give us the chance to configure HDFS with the right amount of
> xcievers out of the box, among other settings.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
