[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900492#action_12900492
]
HBase Review Board commented on HBASE-2915:
-------------------------------------------
Message from: "Jean-Daniel Cryans" <[email protected]>
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/691/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for hbase.
Summary
-------
This patch removes newScannerLock and renames splitAndClose lock to just
"lock". Every operation is now required to obtain the read lock on "lock"
before doing anything (including getting a row lock). This is done by calling
openRegionTransaction inside a try statement and by calling
closeRegionTransaction in finally.
flushcache got refactored some more in order to do the locking in the proper
order; first get the read lock, then do the writestate handling.
Finally, it removes the need to have a writeLock when flushing when subclassers
give atomic work do to via internalPreFlushcacheCommit. This means that this
patch breaks external contribs. This is required to keep our whole locking
mechanism simpler.
This addresses bug HBASE-2915.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2915
Diffs
-----
/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java 987300
/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/SplitTransaction.java
987300
/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestSplitTransaction.java
987300
Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/691/diff
Testing
-------
5 concurrent ICV threads + randomWrite 3 + scans on a single RS. I'm also in
the process of deploying it on a cluster.
Thanks,
Jean-Daniel
> Deadlock between HRegion.ICV and HRegion.close
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2915
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2915
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>
> HRegion.ICV gets a row lock then gets a newScanner lock.
> HRegion.close gets a newScanner lock, slitCloseLock and finally waits for all
> row locks to finish.
> If the ICV got the row lock and then close got the newScannerLock, both end
> up waiting on the other. This was introduced when Get became a Scan.
> Stack thinks we can get rid of the newScannerLock in close since we
> setClosing to true.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
