[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903511#action_12903511
 ] 

Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-1744:
-------------------------------------------

I don't know if it's on your list Lars, but it would be nice when opening 
scanners to be able to pass a scanner caching value. This would make more sense 
than having to set a default value in the configuration to make scanning 
faster, and it would play nice with numRows of getScannerRows.

> Thrift server to match the new java api.
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1744
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: thrift
>            Reporter: Tim Sell
>            Assignee: Tim Sell
>             Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>         Attachments: Hbase.thrift, thriftexperiment.patch
>
>
> This mutateRows, etc.. is a little confusing compared to the new cleaner java 
> client.
> Thinking of ways to make a thrift client that is just as elegant. something 
> like:
> void put(1:Bytes table, 2:TPut put) throws (1:IOError io)
> with:
> struct TColumn {
>   1:Bytes family,
>   2:Bytes qualifier,
>   3:i64 timestamp
> }
> struct TPut {
>   1:Bytes row,
>   2:map<TColumn, Bytes> values
> }
> This creates more verbose rpc  than if the columns in TPut were just 
> map<Bytes, map<Bytes, Bytes>>, but that is harder to fit timestamps into and 
> still be intuitive from say python.
> Presumably the goal of a thrift gateway is to be easy first.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to