[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929952#action_12929952
]
HBase Review Board commented on HBASE-3194:
-------------------------------------------
Message from: [email protected]
bq. On 2010-11-08 20:48:32, stack wrote:
bq. > Meant to say I'm +1 on this.
Also, also meant to say that you are getting good at using this Reflection
stuff Gary.
- stack
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1184/#review1857
-----------------------------------------------------------
> HBase should run on both secure and vanilla versions of Hadoop 0.20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Gary Helmling
>
> There have been a couple cases recently of folks trying to run HBase trunk
> (or 0.89 DRs) on CDH3b3 or secure Hadoop. While HBase security is in the
> works, it currently only runs on secure Hadoop versions. Meanwhile HBase
> trunk won't compile on secure Hadoop due to backward incompatible changes in
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.
> This issue is to work out the minimal set of changes necessary to allow HBase
> to build and run on both secure and non-secure versions of Hadoop. Though,
> with secure Hadoop, I don't even think it's important to target running with
> HDFS security enabled (and krb authentication). Just allow HBase to build
> and run in both versions.
> I think mainly this amounts to abstracting usage of UserGroupInformation and
> UnixUserGroupInformation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
