[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970333#action_12970333
]
stack commented on HBASE-3323:
------------------------------
I'm part way through a review but have to leave. So far it looks like less
moving parts and cleaner overall. Will finish up review tomorrow. We could
set the number of splits to 1 and ship the RC with that but at the moment,
going by the other issues that need fixing, its looking like next week before
new RC and that might be time to test this redo of splits.
> OOME in master splitting logs
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3323
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3323
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: master
> Affects Versions: 0.90.0
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Todd Lipcon
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.90.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-3323.txt, sizes.png
>
>
> In testing a RS failure under heavy increment workload I ran into an OOME
> when the master was splitting the logs.
> In this test case, I have exactly 136 bytes per log entry in all the logs,
> and the logs are all around 66-74MB). With a batch size of 3 logs, this means
> the master is loading about 500K-600K edits per log file. Each edit ends up
> creating 3 byte[] objects, the references for which are each 8 bytes of RAM,
> so we have 160 (136+8*3) bytes per edit used by the byte[]. For each edit we
> also allocate a bunch of other objects: one HLog$Entry, one WALEdit, one
> ArrayList, one LinkedList$Entry, one HLogKey, and one KeyValue. Overall this
> works out to 400 bytes of overhead per edit. So, with the default settings on
> this fairly average workload, the 1.5M log entries takes about 770MB of RAM.
> Since I had a few log files that were a bit larger (around 90MB) it exceeded
> 1GB of RAM and I got an OOME.
> For one, the 400 bytes per edit overhead is pretty bad, and we could probably
> be a lot more efficient. For two, we should actually account this rather than
> simply having a configurable "batch size" in the master.
> I think this is a blocker because I'm running with fairly default configs
> here and just killing one RS made the cluster fall over due to master OOME.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
